The South African government lashed out at President Donald Trump on Thursday after he tweeted that his administration would be looking into farm seizures and the “large scale killing of farmers” in South Africa.
The government said Trump’s tweet was based on “false information” and reflected a “narrow perception which only seeks to divide our nation and reminds us of our colonial past.” It said it was meeting with the U.S. Embassy on Thursday as it seeks to clarify Trump’s remarks.
South Africa’s presidency summoned U.S. charge d’affaires Jessye Lapenn to protest Trump’s tweet, a person familiar with the matter said.
Foreign Minister Lindiwe Sisulu said she would be seeking clarification from the United States over the “unfortunate comments.”
South Africa is in the throes of a racially charged national debate over land reform, a lawful process that seeks to correct the legacy of decades of white minority rule that stripped blacks of their land.
Today, nearly a quarter-century after the first democratic elections, black South Africans, who comprise 80 percent of the population, still own just 4 percent of the country’s land, according to the government.
Though the ruling African National Congress, which has been in power since 1994, has pledged to close that gap, progress has been slow. In July, President Cyril Ramaphosa said his party would amend the constitution so the state could expropriate land without compensation to speed up the land reform process.
Trump’s tweet followed a segment on Fox News on Wednesday in which host Tucker Carlson claimed Ramaphosa had already started “seizing land from his own citizens without compensation because they are the wrong skin color,” calling the alleged seizures “immoral” while describing the South African government as “racist.”
“I have asked Secretary of State @SecPompeo to closely study the South Africa land and farm seizures and expropriations and the large scale killing of farmers … @TuckerCarlson @FoxNews,” Trump’s tweet read.
Though South Africa’s constitution has not yet been amended and the government has not seized any major agricultural land, the prospect has sent panic through some white farming communities who worry the policy will strip them of their land, cause land prices to plummet or make them the target of potentially violent land seizures.
For years, a small but vocal group of white South Africans have claimed white farmers are the target of violent, racially motivated farm attacks.
Experts say the attacks reflect the country’s generally high crime rate and that there is no evidence connecting them to victims’ race. In 2016-17, there were 74 murders that occurred during farm attacks, according to Africa Check, compared to 19,000 murders across the country in the same period.
Agricultural organization AgriSA said earlier this year that farm murders were at a twenty-year low, with 47 murders over a one-year period in 2017-18.
“People are not being targeted because of their race, but because they are vulnerable and isolated on the farms,” said Gareth Newham, head of the crime and justice program at the Institute for Security Studies in the capital, Pretoria.
“There is no white genocide in South Africa,” Julius Malema, leader of the opposition Economic Freedom Fighters party, told reporters. “There is black genocide in the USA; black people are killed every day. There is a black genocide here in South Africa; just recently a farmer was convicted for the murder of a black farmer.”
Malema, who heads the radical left-wing Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), dubbed Trump “a pathological liar.”
“Donald ‘the pathological liar’ Trump, we are not scared of you and your USA or Western imperialist forces,” he said at a press conference.
Trump’s tweet did find some supporters.
AfriForum, a group that represents some white South African interests, welcomed his comments. In May, its leaders went to the U.S. to lobby institutions and politicians about Ramaphosa’s proposal to expropriate land and the alleged targeting of white farmers.
Earlier this month the group posted a list of farms it said were earmarked for expropriation, a list that the government said was fake.
“Everyone in South Africa should hope that the pressure from the USA will lead to the (ruling party) reconsidering the disastrous route that they want to take South Africa on,” AfriForum’s CEO Kallie Kriel said in a statement on Thursday.
AfriForum and other critics of the government’s proposal to expropriate land without compensation say the policy could lead to economic disaster, pointing to the collapse of the agricultural sector in neighboring Zimbabwe after the government of former President Robert Mugabe began seizing white-owned farms, sometimes violently, in 2000.
Proponents of South Africa’s land expropriation policy, including Ramaphosa, say it is necessary to address the country’s historic injustices and can be done in a way that is lawful and will not compromise the beleaguered economy or food security.
In parliament on Wednesday, Ramaphosa said land expropriation could make more land available for cultivation, and that the process would begin by seizing state-owned land, not privately held land.
“This is our South Africa, this is our land, this is where we live,” Rural Development and Land Reform Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane told South Africa’s public broadcaster SABC. “Only solutions of land reform that are South African will work in South Africa.”
Trump who drew ire on the continent earlier this year when he labelled some African countries “shitholes.”
Earlier this year, Australia also caused a diplomatic tiff with Pretoria after Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton said white South African farmers who wished to migrate should receive fast-track visas.
Ramaphosa has said his land reform programme will be carefully carried out, to avoid what happened in Zimbabwe when former President Robert Mugabe’s farm seizures sent the economy into a tailspin.
However, the South African president noted earlier this week that left unaddressed, the land issue would “cause instability,” the South African press reported.
People on South African social media were having a field day with Trump’s controversial comments on Thursday.
“A nation that illegally invaded countries like Iraq to grab oil, and still has land reservations for indigenous Americans, is not morally qualified to interfere in SA and our domestic land issue,” tweeted one user, Simon Grindrod.