With the increasing likelihood of Turkish involvement in Syria, news shows that Washington wants to use Syria to surrender Erdo?an. America knows that Syria will be able to maintain and control many areas under control.
Meanwhile, with the arrival of Turkey into Syria, Turkey’s war machine will definitely be involved with the Syrian issue, and the probability of a repeat of the 2016 failed coup scenario is more likely. Washington’s relationship with Gülen’s flow shows that the Americans do not deliver Gulen at all and use him for the Erdogan alternative. They know that the Turkish government will certainly be troubling Americans in the coming years, and Ankara’s independent course and its relationship with Iran will definitely cost a lot of new sanctions. Accordingly, the intention of Trump is to direct Ankara to a war in Syria and to engage Ankara in a wasting war in order to engage Turkey and Syria together, engage Iran in another case, and add to the regional security gaps while That the security of Israel will be secured for a while.
Everyone knows that the involvement of Turkey in the Syrian battle will certainly cost a lot. Analysts believe Turkey’s involvement in Syria has the following consequences.
1. Economic data: Turkey’s economic situation is not good, and Erdogan is working hard to prevent the collapse of the Lire against the dollar. Even the various calls are not working and the economic conditions of Turkey are not in good condition. With the involvement of Turkey in Syria, the economy that Ankara was designing would be eliminated, and weakened Turkey would be a better deputy for NATO and Washington.
2. Security Consequences: Although the pretext for the war is the Kurdish issue and the formation of the Kurdish climate. But the battle on the Syrian border will certainly be drawn into the territories of Turkey and even Europe, and Ankara will face a wave of terrorism and their return, along with military costs and the damage they cause to the army, which is surely Erdogan and the service Turkish information is involved. Typically, if the PKK Kurds are forced to react and the call for a global war on Turkey is issued, we will see a wave of bombings on the Syrian-Turkish border that could target Turkish civilian populations.
3. Political implications: Turkey has been moving away from its main foreign policy strategy in the past years, reducing tensions with its neighbors and zeroing tensions. The change in the governing board has pushed Ankara to the track and it seems that Turkey is almost ready to return to zero tension policy. The presence in the negotiations of the threshold and the support of the Russian government represents this procedure. The presence in Syria will surely be a response to the various countries, including Iran, Russia and even Iraq, which is bound to be a worrying costly affair. Turkey will provide part of its energy from Iran, and increasing the political and security gap with Tehran can certainly force Iran to leverage its pressure, contrary to the policy of rebuilding decision-making institutions within Turkey over the past few months.
According to estimates, Turkey will enter into Syria with three military and security fronts. It is part of the Takfiri elements’ front, which in no way accepts flow management and even does not accept Turkish aid. This flow will definitely plan for terrorist operations in Turkey and will cost a lot of money to curb Turkey. The second flow will flow, which will certainly be expensive for Turkey. The third is more complicated and much more important. On the one hand, the Syrian government and army, on the other hand, are the axis of resistance. According to the Tehran-Damascus agreement, Iran is obligated to help Damascus in the event of threats from Damascus on the basis of international protocols, and Ankara should be concerned about engagement on this front.
Erdogan seems to have to make a better decision not to be captured by the United States.